DCG Sues Genesis for Over $105M in Inter-Company Crypto Recovery Dispute

Photo of author

By Marcus Davenport

Digital Currency Group (DCG) has initiated legal proceedings against its own subsidiary, Genesis Global Capital, seeking the recovery of over $105 million plus accrued interest. This unusual inter-company litigation unfolds against the backdrop of the crypto market’s significant downturns and complex creditor arrangements, highlighting ongoing financial ripple effects from past industry collapses.

  • DCG has filed a lawsuit against its subsidiary, Genesis Global Capital.
  • The parent company seeks the recovery of over $105 million plus interest.
  • The litigation is an inter-company dispute amidst challenging crypto market conditions.
  • It underscores the lasting financial impact of previous industry failures.
  • The case was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

Background of the Litigation

The lawsuit stems from events following the 2022 bankruptcy of hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC). Genesis, a major creditor of 3AC, suffered substantial losses, including a $2.36 billion deficit from an unfulfilled margin call. In response to this crisis, DCG claims it issued a multi-billion dollar promissory note to stabilize Genesis’s balance sheet and address a capital shortfall specifically within Genesis Asia Pacific.

DCG’s Recovery Claim

DCG’s legal filing asserts that subsequent recovery in the cryptocurrency market, coupled with profits derived from assets termed “TAC Collateral,” not only remedied the initial deficit but also generated gains for Genesis that exceeded the value of the promissory note. The parent company contends that these proceeds, referred to as “TAC Recoveries,” should have fully discharged the principal amount of the note. Consequently, DCG is requesting the court compel Genesis to return funds it claims are no longer necessary to cover the original losses.

Broader Implications for Digital Asset Conglomerates

This legal action underscores the intricate financial relationships and potential disputes that can arise within large digital asset conglomerates, particularly following periods of market stress and significant counterparty defaults. The resolution of this case could set important precedents for inter-company debt obligations and asset recovery strategies in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Spread the love